From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hampton v. City of Jacksonville, Florida

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 29, 1962
304 F.2d 319 (5th Cir. 1962)

Opinion

No. 19297.

May 17, 1962. Rehearing Denied June 29, 1962.

Ernest D. Jackson, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellants.

William M. Madison, Inman P. Crutchfield, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellees.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.


In light of the findings of fact made by the trial court, the only remaining question present in this appeal has been decided adversely to appellants by this Court in City of Montgomery, Ala. v. Gilmore, 5 Cir., 277 F.2d 364. On the strength of that opinion we cannot say that the trial court erred in declining to adjudge the defendants, the appellees here, in contempt of court for failing to continue the operation of the swimming pools in the City of Jacksonville.

The judgment is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hampton v. City of Jacksonville, Florida

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 29, 1962
304 F.2d 319 (5th Cir. 1962)
Case details for

Hampton v. City of Jacksonville, Florida

Case Details

Full title:Frank HAMPTON et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA, et…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jun 29, 1962

Citations

304 F.2d 319 (5th Cir. 1962)

Citing Cases

Sament v. the Hahnemann Medical College Hosp.

test to the facts of Moose Lodge, the Court concluded that the regulatory process embodied in the form of the…

Hampton v. City of Jacksonville, Florida

On the other hand, it is clear, and it is conceded by the appellants, that there is no requirement under the…