From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammontree v. Hawley

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 15, 1943
52 N.E.2d 346 (Ohio 1943)

Opinion

No. 29752

Decided December 15, 1943.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Injunction and declaratory judgment denied — Absence of evidence supporting allegation of actual controversy presenting justiciable dispute — Suspension or revocation of C-2 permit — Regulation 32a of Board of Liquor Control — Pin ball machine in drug store of permit holder — Section 6064-3, General Code — Section 16, Article I, Sections 1 and 26, Article II, and Section 1, Article IV, Constitution — Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Franklin county.

Mr. Eugene L. Hensel, for appellant.

Mr. Thomas J. Herbert, attorney general, and Mr. John P. Walsh, for appellees.


It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, BELL, WILLIAMS and TURNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hammontree v. Hawley

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 15, 1943
52 N.E.2d 346 (Ohio 1943)
Case details for

Hammontree v. Hawley

Case Details

Full title:HAMMONTREE, APPELLANT v. HAWLEY ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 15, 1943

Citations

52 N.E.2d 346 (Ohio 1943)
52 N.E.2d 346

Citing Cases

Town of Orford v. N.H. Air Resources Comm

They were not entitled to declaratory relief based merely on the hypothetical existence of an open-burning…

Preferred Risk Ins. Co. v. Gill

Under this court's holding in Transamerica, supra, the declaratory judgment action in this case would have…