From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammond Lane Mech. v. Village of Potsdam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 3, 1986
119 A.D.2d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

April 3, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, St. Lawrence County (Shea, J.).


Plaintiff contracted to install heating, ventilation and air-conditioning equipment at a water treatment plant owned and operated by defendant. Plaintiff commenced this action alleging that wrongful delay by defendant caused it $225,000 in damages. Defendant moved to dismiss on the ground that the action was not timely commenced. Special Term denied the motion and this appeal ensued.

A contract action against a village must be commenced within 18 months after the cause of action accrues, and a written verified claim must be filed within one year after such accrual; the failure to comply with these provisions constitutes a bar to any claim (CPLR 9802). In circumstances such as those herein, it has been held that a claim accrues when the claimant should have viewed his claim as having been rejected (Arnell Constr. Corp. v Village of N. Tarrytown, 100 A.D.2d 562, 563, affd 64 N.Y.2d 916). Here, plaintiff wrote to the project engineers on September 9, 1983 itemizing cost overruns due to circumstances beyond its control. The engineers responded by letter dated October 10, 1983 expressing their views regarding liability for the various items. It was at this point that plaintiff should have viewed certain of its claims as having been rejected, and at this point the cause of action accrued for the purposes of CPLR 9802. Since the notice of claim and complaint were timely served after this time, Special Term properly denied defendant's motion to dismiss.

Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hammond Lane Mech. v. Village of Potsdam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 3, 1986
119 A.D.2d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Hammond Lane Mech. v. Village of Potsdam

Case Details

Full title:HAMMOND LANE MECHANICALS, INC., Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF POTSDAM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1986

Citations

119 A.D.2d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Town of Nassau v. Westchester Fire Ins. Co.

Town Law § 65 (3) requires, inter alia, that a notice of claim be filed within six months following the…

Fitzgerald Morris Baker Firth P.C. v. Mayor of Vill. of Hoosick Falls

In doing this, the essential notice given by the action causing the breach is removed. In litigation…