From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammer v. Phi, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Dec 1, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-1048 (W.D. La. Dec. 1, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-1048

12-01-2016

NORMAN M. HAMMER, ET AL. v. PHI, INC., ET AL.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HANNA

JUDGMENT

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed. The Court concludes that the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge is correct. Accordingly;

IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiffs' Motion to Remand [rec. doc. 24] is denied.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Lafayette, Louisiana, on this 1st day of December, 2016.

/s/ _________

REBECCA F. DOHERTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hammer v. Phi, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Dec 1, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-1048 (W.D. La. Dec. 1, 2016)
Case details for

Hammer v. Phi, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NORMAN M. HAMMER, ET AL. v. PHI, INC., ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Dec 1, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-1048 (W.D. La. Dec. 1, 2016)

Citing Cases

Hammer v. PHI Inc.

II. Jurisdiction and Choice of LawThis Court has already determined that jurisdiction exists by virtue of the…