From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammer v. Kmart Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1999
267 A.D.2d 1100 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

December 30, 1999

Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — Negligence.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed.

PRESENT: PINE, J. P., HAYES, WISNER, PIGOTT, JR., AND SCUDDER, JJ.


Memorandum:

Supreme Court erred in denying defendant's motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff's case. Plaintiff fell on what she believed was a puddle of water on the floor of defendant's store. We reject plaintiff's contention that defendant had constructive notice of a dangerous condition because it was snowy and icy outside, and defendant knew that water may accumulate in different areas in the store ( see, Piacquadio v. Recine Realty Corp., 84 N.Y.2d 967, 969). Plaintiff failed to prove that the water on the floor where she fell was apparent and existed for a sufficient length of time prior to the fall to permit defendant's employees to discover and remedy the defect ( cf., Negri v. Stop Shop, 65 N.Y.2d 625, 626).

In addition, although plaintiff proved that defendant had a general awareness that water was present in the front area of the store when the weather was inclement ( see, Piacquadio v. Recine Realty Corp., supra), she failed to prove that defendant had actual knowledge of a recurring condition, i.e., that defendant knew that, during inclement weather conditions, water accumulated on the floor in the aisle where she fell ( cf., Migli v. Davenport, 249 A.D.2d 932, 933; Camizzi v. Tops, Inc., 244 A.D.2d 1002).


Summaries of

Hammer v. Kmart Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1999
267 A.D.2d 1100 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Hammer v. Kmart Corporation

Case Details

Full title:BETTE K. HAMMER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KMART CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1999

Citations

267 A.D.2d 1100 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
700 N.Y.S.2d 345

Citing Cases

Solazzo v. New York City Transit Authority

Here, plaintiff submitted evidence that his accident occurred in mid-afternoon and precipitation had been…

Reid v. State

The evidence must show an "ongoing and recurring dangerous condition existed in the area of the accident…