From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamm v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
May 15, 2018
CIVIL NO. 2:16-CV-627-DBH (D. Me. May. 15, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 2:16-CV-627-DBH

05-15-2018

GEORGE HAMM, PLAINTIFF v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, DEFENDANT


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On April 30, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Recommended Decision on Application for Attorney Fees. The time within which to file objections expired on May 14, 2018, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The plaintiff's EAJA Application is GRANTED in the amount of $6,457.55.

SO ORDERED.

DATED THIS 15TH DAY OF MAY, 2018

/S/D. BROCK HORNBY

D. BROCK HORNBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hamm v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
May 15, 2018
CIVIL NO. 2:16-CV-627-DBH (D. Me. May. 15, 2018)
Case details for

Hamm v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE HAMM, PLAINTIFF v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: May 15, 2018

Citations

CIVIL NO. 2:16-CV-627-DBH (D. Me. May. 15, 2018)

Citing Cases

Glenwood W. v. Soc. Sec. Admin. Comm'r

He cites caselaw to support his observation that the Commissioner has repeatedly lost challenges premised on…