From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamilton v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 18, 2019
171 A.D.3d 1385 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

527588

04-18-2019

In the Matter of Rohan HAMILTON, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Rohan Hamilton, Dannemora, petitioner pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Rohan Hamilton, Dannemora, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., Clark, Mulvey, Aarons and Rumsey, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENTProceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $ 5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Petitioner has no right to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination (see e.g. Matter of Woods v. Annucci, 131 A.D.3d 742, 743, 13 N.Y.S.3d 921 [2015] ). Accordingly, given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Williams v. Keyser, 167 A.D.3d 1202, 1202, 87 N.Y.S.3d 909 [2018] ; Matter of Houghtaling v. Venettozzi, 160 A.D.3d 1309, 1309, 72 N.Y.S.3d 509 [2018] ). Finally, as the record reflects that petitioner paid a reduced filing fee of $ 15 and he has requested reimbursement thereof, we grant petitioner's request for that amount. Petitioner failed to submit proof with respect to his other requested reimbursement.

Garry, P.J., Clark, Mulvey, Aarons and Rumsey, JJ., concur.ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $ 15.


Summaries of

Hamilton v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 18, 2019
171 A.D.3d 1385 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Hamilton v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROHAN HAMILTON, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 18, 2019

Citations

171 A.D.3d 1385 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
96 N.Y.S.3d 917
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 2940

Citing Cases

King v. Venettozzi

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…

Jeffreys v. N.Y.S. Dep't of Corr. & Cmty. Supervision

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…