From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamann v. Little Italy's Meatballs, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Apr 20, 2021
Case No. 8:20-cv-2589-VMC-AEP (M.D. Fla. Apr. 20, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 8:20-cv-2589-VMC-AEP

04-20-2021

ALEXIS HAMANN, Plaintiff, v. LITTLE ITALY'S MEATBALLS, LLC, and CARL R. MEYERS, JR., Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on consideration of United States Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 25), filed on March 31, 2021. Judge Porcelli recommends that Plaintiff Alexis Hamann's Amended Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. # 19) be granted in part and denied in part.

Specifically, the report recommends denying Hamann her request for pre-judgment interest (Doc. # 25 at 17), but awarding the following amounts: (1) unpaid wages in the amount of $181.25; (2) liquidated damages in the amount of $181.25; (3) unpaid tips in the amount of $877.00; (4) attorney's fees in the amount of $1,480.00; (5) and costs in the amount of $490.00. (Id. at 18). Judge Porcelli also recommends awarding post-judgment interest. (Id.).

As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed and the time for filing objections has lapsed. The Court accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation and grants in part the Amended Motion for Default Judgment. Discussion

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994).

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings, conclusions and recommendations, and giving de novo review to matters of law, the Court accepts the factual findings and legal conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 25) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. (2) Plaintiff Alexis Hamann's Amended Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. # 19) is GRANTED in part. (3) The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Hamann and against Defendants Little Italy's Meatballs, LLC and Carl R. Meyers, Jr. in the following amounts: (1) unpaid wages in the amount of $181.25; (2) liquidated damages in the amount of $181.25; (3) unpaid tips in the amount of $877.00; (4) attorney's fees in the amount of $1,480.00; and (5) costs in the amount of $490.00. (4) Hamann is also awarded post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. Interest shall accrue from the date of this judgment at the federal statutory rate. (5) Hamann's request for prejudgment interest is DENIED. (6) Upon entry of judgment, the Clerk is directed to CLOSE THE CASE.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this 20th day of April, 2021.

/s/_________

VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hamann v. Little Italy's Meatballs, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Apr 20, 2021
Case No. 8:20-cv-2589-VMC-AEP (M.D. Fla. Apr. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Hamann v. Little Italy's Meatballs, LLC

Case Details

Full title:ALEXIS HAMANN, Plaintiff, v. LITTLE ITALY'S MEATBALLS, LLC, and CARL R…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: Apr 20, 2021

Citations

Case No. 8:20-cv-2589-VMC-AEP (M.D. Fla. Apr. 20, 2021)

Citing Cases

Rivera v. Waste Pro of Fla.

In fact, the practice in the Middle District of Florida is to award attorney's fees for FLSA cases at rates…

Feliciano v. Styrofoam Moulding Co.

states are entitled to set a higher minimum wage under state law, a plaintiff is not entitled to recover the…