From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Halpern v. Koikos

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Oct 31, 2018
255 So. 3d 535 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. 1D17-792

10-31-2018

Keith A. HALPERN, Appellant, v. Nikoleta G. KOIKOS, Appellee.

Keith A. Halpern, pro se, Appellant. No appearance, for Appellee.


Keith A. Halpern, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant challenges the injunction against domestic violence entered January 26, 2017, after the final hearing held that same date. Appellant argues that the injunction was not supported by competent substantial evidence. However, after our order allowing Appellant to supplement the record with a transcript of the hearing or stipulated statement of the evidence, he did not do so. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.200(b)(4), (f)(2). Accordingly, we must affirm. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979) ; Murphy v. Blubaugh , 43 Fla. L. Weekly D1712, 252 So.3d 809 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) ; Jackson v. Echols , 937 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ; Ricketts v. Ricketts , 790 So.2d 1265 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) ; Ain v. Ain , 778 So.2d 1029 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

AFFIRMED .

Wetherell, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Halpern v. Koikos

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Oct 31, 2018
255 So. 3d 535 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Halpern v. Koikos

Case Details

Full title:KEITH A. HALPERN, Appellant, v. NIKOLETA G. KOIKOS, Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Oct 31, 2018

Citations

255 So. 3d 535 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)