From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hallman v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION
Mar 14, 2017
CIVIL NO. 2:16-cv-2052-MEF (W.D. Ark. Mar. 14, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 2:16-cv-2052-MEF

03-14-2017

JODY S. HALLMAN PLAINTIFF v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration DEFENDANT


FINAL JUDGMENT

This cause is before the court on the Plaintiff's complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding application for Disability Insurance Benefits. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The court, having reviewed the record, the administrative transcript, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, and the parties having waived oral argument, finds as follows, to-wit:

For the reasons announced by the court on the record on March 13, 2017, the court finds that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is supported by substantial evidence, and the same is hereby affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED this the 14th day of March 2017.

/s/ Mark E. Ford

HON. MARK E. FORD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hallman v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION
Mar 14, 2017
CIVIL NO. 2:16-cv-2052-MEF (W.D. Ark. Mar. 14, 2017)
Case details for

Hallman v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:JODY S. HALLMAN PLAINTIFF v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION

Date published: Mar 14, 2017

Citations

CIVIL NO. 2:16-cv-2052-MEF (W.D. Ark. Mar. 14, 2017)