Halleck v. Manhattan Cmty. Access Corp.

Full title: DEEDEE HALLECK, JESUS PAPOLETO MELENDEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v…

Court: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 1, 2019

No. 16-4155-cv (2d Cir. Aug. 1, 2019)

Opinion

No. 16-4155-cv

08-01-2019

DEEDEE HALLECK, JESUS PAPOLETO MELENDEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MANHATTAN COMMUNITY ACCESS CORPORATION, DANIEL COUGHLIN, JEANETTE SANTIAGO, CORY BRYCE, CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendants-Appellees.

FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS: ROBERT T. PERRY, Brooklyn, NY. FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES: MICHAEL B. DE LEEUW, (Tamar S. Wise, on the brief), Cozen O'Connor, New York, NY, for Manhattan Community Access Corporation, Daniel Coughlin, Jeanette Santiago and Cory Bryce. SCOTT N. SHORR, Asst. Corp. Counsel, New York, NY (Zachary W. Carter, Corp. Counsel of the City of New York, Claude S. Platton, Asst. Corp. Counsel, New York, NY, on the brief), for City of New York.

FOR THE COURT: Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk

SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 1^st day of August, two thousand nineteen. PRESENT: JON O. NEWMAN, DENNIS JACOBS, RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR., Circuit Judges. FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS: ROBERT T. PERRY, Brooklyn, NY. FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES: MICHAEL B. DE LEEUW, (Tamar S. Wise, on the brief), Cozen O'Connor, New York, NY, for Manhattan Community Access Corporation, Daniel Coughlin, Jeanette Santiago and Cory Bryce. SCOTT N. SHORR, Asst. Corp. Counsel, New York, NY (Zachary W. Carter, Corp. Counsel of the City of New York, Claude S. Platton, Asst. Corp. Counsel, New York, NY, on the brief), for City of New York.

On remand from the Supreme Court.

UPON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is Affirmed.

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court, which reversed in relevant part and remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. See Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, 139 S. Ct. 1921 (2019).

Upon further consideration, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

FOR THE COURT:

Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk