From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 6, 1990
568 So. 2d 1346 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 90-1747.

November 6, 1990.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Clinton Foster, Judge.

David Davis, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jim Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


AFFIRMED. See Cobb v. State, 567 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Huff v. State, 566 So.2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Fla.R.App.P. 9.315(a). We certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:

DOES A JEOPARDY VIOLATION RESULT FROM THE IMPOSITION OF A PROBATIONARY SPLIT SENTENCE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE HAS NOT EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZED THAT DISPOSITION IN THE SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES FOR § 921.087, FLA. STAT.?

SHIVERS, C.J., and SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 6, 1990
568 So. 2d 1346 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Hall v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID LEE HALL, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 6, 1990

Citations

568 So. 2d 1346 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. State

Some judges still have qualms about the legality of a "probationary split sentence" not because of the…