From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. St. Mary's Seminary University

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 20, 2010
378 F. App'x 326 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-1564.

Submitted: March 25, 2010.

Decided: May 20, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (1:08-cv-03281-BEL).

Leslie R. Stellman, Hodes, Pessin Katz, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellant. David G. Sommer, Steven G. Metzger, Gallagher, Evelius Jones, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


L. Hall appeals the district court's order granting the University's motion to dismiss her claims, brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (2006); the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 to 7961 (2006); and Title IX of the Education. Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq. (2006), as well as her breach of contract claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See Hall v. St. Mary's Seminary Univ., 608 F.Supp.2d (D.Md. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Hall v. St. Mary's Seminary University

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 20, 2010
378 F. App'x 326 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Hall v. St. Mary's Seminary University

Case Details

Full title:L. HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ST. MARY'S SEMINARY UNIVERSITY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 20, 2010

Citations

378 F. App'x 326 (4th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

MAS Assocs. v. Venick

“In the context of claim preclusion, the term ‘privity' refers to ‘a person so identified in interest with…

Adrian v. Wash. Metro Area Transit Auth.

Mere “roster changes” will not defeat the identity of parties requirement. Hall v. St. Mary's Seminary &…