From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 16, 2014
Case No. CV 12-4770-JGB (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. CV 12-4770-JGB (SP)

07-16-2014

CHRISTOPHER A. HALL, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment will be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

__________

HONORABLE JESUS G. BERNAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hall v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 16, 2014
Case No. CV 12-4770-JGB (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2014)
Case details for

Hall v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER A. HALL, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 16, 2014

Citations

Case No. CV 12-4770-JGB (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2014)

Citing Cases

Gupta v. Beard

Accordingly, because there is no clearly established federal law governing Petitioner's claim, the Court has…

Davall v. Warren Montgomery

This Court concludes, however, that Petitioner's claim also fail under AEDPA review because “there are no…