From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Lynchburg Division
Jul 9, 2008
CIVIL NO. 6:07cv00021 (W.D. Va. Jul. 9, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 6:07cv00021.

July 9, 2008


ORDER


On August 2, 2007, I referred this case to the Honorable Michael F. Urbanski, United States Magistrate Judge, for proposed findings of fact and a recommended disposition. The parties subsequently filed cross motions for summary judgment [Docket #10, #14] and on June 17, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation ("Report"). In the Report, Judge Urbanski recommended that Defendant's motion for summary judgment [Docket #14] be granted. After a review of the entire record in this case, and no objection having been filed to the Report within ten days of its service upon the parties, I adopt the Report in its entirety.

Accordingly:

1. the June 17, 2008 Report shall be, and it hereby is, ADOPTED in its entirety;
2. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Docket #10] is hereby DENIED;
3. Defendant's motion for summary judgment [Docket #14] is hereby GRANTED;
4. the Commissioner's final decision is hereby AFFIRMED; and
5. this case is hereby DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket.

The Clerk of the Court hereby is directed to send a certified copy of this Order to all counsel of record.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hall v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Lynchburg Division
Jul 9, 2008
CIVIL NO. 6:07cv00021 (W.D. Va. Jul. 9, 2008)
Case details for

Hall v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH M. HALL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Lynchburg Division

Date published: Jul 9, 2008

Citations

CIVIL NO. 6:07cv00021 (W.D. Va. Jul. 9, 2008)

Citing Cases

Ruybal v. Astrue

it comes out . . . eight, nine, ten months after the surgery it still looks like you're not going to be on…