From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hale v. Warden, London Correctional Institution

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Nov 6, 2006
Case No. 1:05cv213 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 6, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 1:05cv213.

November 6, 2006


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed October 19, 2006 (Doc. 8).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. This action is closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hale v. Warden, London Correctional Institution

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Nov 6, 2006
Case No. 1:05cv213 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 6, 2006)
Case details for

Hale v. Warden, London Correctional Institution

Case Details

Full title:Alonzo Hale, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Warden, London Correctional Institution…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Nov 6, 2006

Citations

Case No. 1:05cv213 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 6, 2006)

Citing Cases

Hysell v. Warden, Ross Corr. Inst.

Further, where a petitioner signs a guilty plea acknowledging that he understands his right to appeal, his…

Smith v. Warden

Therefore, Petitioner's 2007 judgment of conviction became final under 28 U.S.C. §2244(d)(1)(A) on December…