From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hale v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Sep 18, 2015
174 So. 3d 1103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 2D14–5494.

09-18-2015

Troy E. HALE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.


Opinion

Troy Hale appeals the order denying his motion for jail credit under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. We affirm without prejudice to Hale's right to file a timely motion under rule 3.850. See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045, 1052 (Fla.2011). We caution, however, that “[w]hen a criminal defendant seeks to withdraw a negotiated plea, or to attack it collaterally, if he is successful he loses the benefit of the bargain he has elected to attack.” Id. (quoting Moreland v. Smith, 664 So.2d 1039, 1040 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) ).

CRENSHAW and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Hale v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Sep 18, 2015
174 So. 3d 1103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Hale v. State

Case Details

Full title:Troy E. HALE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Sep 18, 2015

Citations

174 So. 3d 1103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Ancrum v. State

Because a claim for jail credit beyond the amount agreed to in a plea bargain is not cognizable in a rule…