From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haino v. Kiraly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1936
247 App. Div. 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

March, 1936.

Present — Martin, P.J., McAvoy, O'Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.


Action to recover damages for personal injuries and for loss of services. Plaintiffs were tenants in an apartment house owned by defendants. Plaintiff Gertrude Haino, in attempting to pull down the bathroom window of their apartment, was caused to lose her balance and fall into the bathtub when the frame or sash broke. Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless plaintiffs stipulate to reduce the judgment as entered in favor of the plaintiff Gertrude Haino to the sum of $2,682.20; in which event the judgment as so modified is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Haino v. Kiraly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1936
247 App. Div. 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Haino v. Kiraly

Case Details

Full title:GERTRUDE HAINO and REINHOLD HAINO, Respondents, v. STEPHEN KIRALY, SR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1936

Citations

247 App. Div. 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Weiss v. Wallach

( Altz v. Leiberson, 233 N.Y. 16.) That naturally included the windows in plaintiff's apartment. ( Haino v.…