From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hainan v. S&T Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 22, 2011
CA No. 2:10-cv-01600 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 22, 2011)

Opinion

CA No. 2:10-cv-01600

08-22-2011

SANDRA L. HAINAN, Plaintiff, v. S&T Bank, a business, and LORI BARTOLETTA, an individual, Defendants.

THE WILLIAMS LAW OFFICE Susan Williams ( PA ID No. 40077 ) BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC Terry D. Roberts ( PA ID No. 310148 )


Judge

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

The parties to the above-captioned civil action, by their undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of this civil action, each party to bear its own costs and fees as more fully set forth in their confidential Settlement Agreement and Release.

THE WILLIAMS LAW OFFICE

Susan Williams (PA ID No. 40077)

BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC

Terry D. Roberts (PA ID No. 310148)

____,CJ.


Summaries of

Hainan v. S&T Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 22, 2011
CA No. 2:10-cv-01600 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Hainan v. S&T Bank

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA L. HAINAN, Plaintiff, v. S&T Bank, a business, and LORI BARTOLETTA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 22, 2011

Citations

CA No. 2:10-cv-01600 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 22, 2011)

Citing Cases

Randler v. Kitchens

Moreover, the court notes that Randler has failed to come forward with any independent set of facts upon…