Opinion
Submitted February 15, 1935 —
Decided May 17, 1935.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 113 N.J.L. 361.
For the appellant, Samuel Dreskin.
For the respondents, Coult, Satz Tomlinson.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, LLOYD, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.