From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Habib v. Best yet Mkt. of Hicksville, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 26, 2012
101 A.D.3d 1083 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-12-26

Nadia HABIB, et al., appellants, v. BEST YET MARKET OF HICKSVILLE, INC., et al., defendants-respondents, et al., Roy Mahon, etc., nonparty-respondent.

Morrison & Wagner, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Eric H. Morrison of counsel), for appellants. Martyn, Toher & Martyn, Mineola, N.Y. (Thomas M. Martyn of counsel), for defendants-respondents.


Morrison & Wagner, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Eric H. Morrison of counsel), for appellants. Martyn, Toher & Martyn, Mineola, N.Y. (Thomas M. Martyn of counsel), for defendants-respondents.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Richard Dearing and Oren L. Zeve of counsel; Scott Weingart on the brief), for nonparty-respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Marano, J.), dated August 3, 2011, which denied their motion to compel the deposition of a nonparty witness and to extend their time to file a motion to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPLR 4404.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was to extend the time within which to make a posttrial motion to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPLR 4404 ( see CPLR 4405; Brzozowy v. ELRAC, Inc., 39 A.D.3d 451, 833 N.Y.S.2d 590). Moreover, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was to compel the deposition of a nonparty witness, *893the Justice who presided over the trial in this case. Even if the plaintiffs made a sufficient showing as to relevancy, they did not demonstrate that the information they sought could not be obtained from other sources ( see Cotton v. Cotton, 91 A.D.3d 697, 699, 938 N.Y.S.2d 92;Kooper v. Kooper 74 A.D.3d 6, 901 N.Y.S.2d 312).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the parties' remaining contentions.

ANGIOLILLO, J.P., DICKERSON, HALL and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Habib v. Best yet Mkt. of Hicksville, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 26, 2012
101 A.D.3d 1083 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Habib v. Best yet Mkt. of Hicksville, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Nadia HABIB, et al., appellants, v. BEST YET MARKET OF HICKSVILLE, INC.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 26, 2012

Citations

101 A.D.3d 1083 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 9029
955 N.Y.S.2d 892

Citing Cases

Caban v. Plaza Constr. Corp.

Thus, the defendants failed to demonstrate that additional testimony from the nonparty witnesses or the…

Caban v. Plaza Constr. Corp.

Thus, the defendants failed to demonstrate that additional testimony from the nonparty witnesses or the…