From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

H. Lissner Co. v. Oceanic Steam Nav. Co.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 7, 1929
30 F.2d 290 (2d Cir. 1929)

Opinion

No. 136.

January 7, 1929.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Libel by H. Lissner Co., Inc., against the Oceanic Steam Navigation Company, Limited, for cargo damage. From an interlocutory decree, libelant appeals. Appeal dismissed.

Harry D. Thirkield, of New York City, for appellant.

Burlingham, Veeder, Masten Fearey, of New York City (Ray Rood Allen and Norman M. Barron, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.


This appeal is from an alleged interlocutory decree which provides as follows:

"Ordered, that libelant's said damages be computed on the basis of the $100 per package clause contained in the bill of lading set forth in the libel, and not on any higher basis: Provided, however, that the allegations of said libel which have not been admitted by respondent in its answer be duly established before the commissioner by stipulation between the parties or by proof."

Such a determination is not an interlocutory decree in admiralty, determining the rights and liabilities of the parties as the statute provides. 44 Stat. L. 233 (28 USCA § 227). It is not now reviewable. The correctness of such an order may not be tested until the rights and liabilities of the parties have been determined, leaving only the question of damages for determination.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

H. Lissner Co. v. Oceanic Steam Nav. Co.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 7, 1929
30 F.2d 290 (2d Cir. 1929)
Case details for

H. Lissner Co. v. Oceanic Steam Nav. Co.

Case Details

Full title:H. LISSNER CO., Inc., v. OCEANIC STEAM NAV. CO., Limited

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jan 7, 1929

Citations

30 F.2d 290 (2d Cir. 1929)

Citing Cases

Miskiewicz v. Goodman

Some decisions appear to turn on the view that Section 1292(a)(3) was intended to cover only the situation in…

In re Wills Lines

It has been repeatedly held, in this Circuit and elsewhere, that interlocutory decrees "determining the…