From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gyory v. Radgowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 1975
48 A.D.2d 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

June 2, 1975


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the parties cross-appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered November 4, 1974, as follows: (1) plaintiffs appeal from so much of the said order as denied their motion to dismiss the second affirmative defense and (2) defendants appeal from so much of the said order as (a) dismissed their first affirmative defense and (b) failed to grant them summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs. Since the record in the case at bar does not make clear Fairchild's instructions to its employees relating to their activities in Ohio and, more specifically, whether plaintiff Frank Gyory's decision to extend the conference an extra day was expressly or impliedly authorized, Special Term properly found that the question of whether workmen's compensation is the exclusive remedy must await a determination after trial. Rabin, Acting P.J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gyory v. Radgowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 1975
48 A.D.2d 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Gyory v. Radgowski

Case Details

Full title:FRANK GYORY et al., Appellants-Respondents v. EDWARD RADGOWSKI et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 2, 1975

Citations

48 A.D.2d 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Matter of Gyory v. Fairchild Industries, Inc.

The defense of workers' compensation as claimant's exclusive remedy was interposed and claimant moved to…

Gyory v. Radgowski

On a prior motion to dismiss the same defense, the Appellate Division, in affirming Special Term, ruled that…