From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guzman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 15, 1978
364 So. 2d 523 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. 78-537.

November 15, 1978.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Harry Lee Coe, III, J.

Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, Bartow, and Karal B. Rushing, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Marie King, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Appellant filed his notice of appeal in this case on March 3, 1978, more than thirty days past January 9, 1978, the date upon which the trial court filed its judgment and sentence. Accordingly we must dismiss this appeal as untimely. Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(b)(2); Kurz v. State, 303 So.2d 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974).

We note that following the filing of the judgment and sentence, appellant filed a motion for reconsideration of sentence. However, this fact does not change our decision because a motion for reconsideration of sentence is not one of those motions which tolls the running of the appeal time. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.020(g).

HOBSON, Acting C.J., and SCHEB and DANAHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Guzman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 15, 1978
364 So. 2d 523 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Guzman v. State

Case Details

Full title:FERNANDO GUZMAN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 15, 1978

Citations

364 So. 2d 523 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Klemba v. State

We do not have jurisdiction to consider Mr. Klemba's appeal. A motion to reduce a sentence is not a…

State v. Holdefer

Accordingly, this court has no jurisdiction over the appeal from the order denying the petition, and we…