From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guzman v. Sam's Club

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Sep 28, 2022
Civil Action 1:21-cv-00192 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 28, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:21-cv-00192

09-28-2022

GABRIEL H. GUZMAN, "Plaintiff', v. SAM'S CLUB, "Defendant".


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ROLANDO OLVERA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court are these pleadings: Defendant's "Motion for Summary Judgment" ("MSJ") (Dkt. No. 9), Plaintiff's "Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment" ("Response") (Dkt. No. 13), Defendant's "Amended Reply in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment" ("First Amended Reply") (Dkt. No. 18), Plaintiff's "Surreply in Support of Denial of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment" ("Surreply") (Dkt. No. 24) and the "Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation" ("R&R") (Dkt. No. 45). The R&R recommends this Court grant Defendant's MSJ (Dkt. No. 9).

No objections were filed by either party. When no objections are filed to a magistrate judge's ruling,the district court applies the "clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law" standard of review. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989). Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R is ADOPTED.

Defendant's MSJ (Dkt. No. 9) is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Guzman v. Sam's Club

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Sep 28, 2022
Civil Action 1:21-cv-00192 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Guzman v. Sam's Club

Case Details

Full title:GABRIEL H. GUZMAN, "Plaintiff', v. SAM'S CLUB, "Defendant".

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Sep 28, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:21-cv-00192 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 28, 2022)

Citing Cases

Barco v. Alpine Silica, LLC

Absent more specific allegations regarding when Barco received the Notice letter, the Court must assume that…