From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guzman v. Perez

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Nov 21, 2019
65 Misc. 3d 151 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)

Opinion

2018-1594 W C

11-21-2019

Johnny GUZMAN, Respondent, v. Arthemio PEREZ, Appellant.

James G. Dibbini & Associates, P.C. (James G. Dibbini of counsel), for appellant. Andrew M. Romano, Esq., for respondent.


James G. Dibbini & Associates, P.C. (James G. Dibbini of counsel), for appellant.

Andrew M. Romano, Esq., for respondent.

PRESENT: : THOMAS A. ADAMS, P.J., TERRY JANE RUDERMAN, ELIZABETH H. EMERSON, JJ

ORDERED that the order entered July 16, 2018, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, without costs, and, upon, in effect, reargument, the branches of tenant's motion seeking to vacate the final judgment and, upon such vacatur, to restore the proceeding to the calendar are granted.

In this illegal-sublet holdover proceeding, the City Court entered a final judgment in favor of landlord following tenant's failure to timely make a court-ordered deposit of use and occupancy. Tenant appeals from so much of an order of the City Court entered July 16, 2018 as, upon, in effect, reargument, adhered to the determination in a prior order of that court denying the branches of tenant's motion seeking to vacate the final judgment and, upon such vacatur, to restore the proceeding to the calendar.

It was an error for the court to enter a final judgment based on tenant's failure to make the court-ordered deposit (see Carlos v. Primus , 58 Misc 3d 159[A], 2018 NY Slip Op 50247[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2018]; Merenda v. Fried , 42 Misc 3d 136[A], 2014 NY Slip Op 50117[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2014]; Zabolotny v. Andersen , 19 Misc 3d 128[A], 2008 NY Slip Op 50517[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2008] ). We note, in any event, that tenant showed an excuse for the failure to timely make the deposit, in that landlord had refused to renew his lease and to sign a shelter allowance form.

Accordingly, the order entered July 16, 2018, insofar as appealed from, is reversed and, upon, in effect, reargument, the branches of tenant's motion seeking to vacate the final judgment and, upon such vacatur, to restore the proceeding to the calendar are granted.

ADAMS, P.J., RUDERMAN and EMERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Guzman v. Perez

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Nov 21, 2019
65 Misc. 3d 151 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
Case details for

Guzman v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:Johnny Guzman, Respondent, v. Arthemio Perez, Appellant.

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Nov 21, 2019

Citations

65 Misc. 3d 151 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 51877
119 N.Y.S.3d 686

Citing Cases

Ratnam Assocs. v. Disc. King U.S., Inc.

Thereafter, by order dated January 31, 2018, the District Court denied tenants' motion without elaboration.…