From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guthrie v. Eber

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Oct 4, 2011
431 F. App'x 519 (8th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-1778.

Submitted: September 27, 2011.

Filed: October 4, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

William Edward Tarvin, Tarvin Law Firm, Bentonville, AR, for Appellants.

Jason Scott Retter, Assistant Attorney General, Attorney General's Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellees.

Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.


[UNPUBLISHED]


Connie and Karl Guthrie appeal the district court's denial of their motion under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) for an extension of time to file an appeal in their civil action. After careful review, see Gibbons v. United States, 317 F.3d 852, 853-54 (8th Cir. 2003), we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion by finding that the Guthries failed to show excusable neglect warranting an extension. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.


Summaries of

Guthrie v. Eber

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Oct 4, 2011
431 F. App'x 519 (8th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Guthrie v. Eber

Case Details

Full title:Connie Sue GUTHRIE; Karl David Guthrie, Jr., Appellants, v. Jerry EBER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Oct 4, 2011

Citations

431 F. App'x 519 (8th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Parato v. Maestro Health

Mountain Home Sch. Dist., 926 F.3d 942, 951-52 (8th Cir. 2019); Guthrie v. Eber, 431 Fed.Appx. 519 (8th…

Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Cantina El Sol, LLC

District courts are afforded discretion in determining whether there is excusable neglect. See Albright as…