From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gurvich v. Motor Vehicle Accident

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 2009
66 A.D.3d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-10640.

October 6, 2009.

In a proceeding pursuant to Insurance Law § 5218 (c) for leave to commence an action against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated September 10, 2008, which granted the petition.

Cruz and Gangi and Associates (Connors Connors, P.C., Staten Island, N.Y. [Robert J. Pfuhler] of counsel), for appellant.

William Pager, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Dillon, Dickerson, Belen and Lott, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation opposed the petition for leave to commence an action against it on the ground that the petitioner failed to report the subject accident to the police within 24 hours of the occurrence. However, the courts have "consistently afforded a very liberal interpretation to the notice requirement, accepting police contacts that fall far short of the operator's obtaining a written report" ( Matter of Country Wide Ins. Co. [Russo], 201 AD2d 368, 370; see Canty v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 95 AD2d 509; Matter of Dixon v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 56 AD2d 650). Under the circumstances of this case, sufficient notice of the accident was timely given to the police.


Summaries of

Gurvich v. Motor Vehicle Accident

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 2009
66 A.D.3d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Gurvich v. Motor Vehicle Accident

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EMMA GURVICH, Respondent, v. MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 6, 2009

Citations

66 A.D.3d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 7254
885 N.Y.S.2d 770

Citing Cases

Zuckerberg v. The Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

Neither does petitioner's representation that he was unable to leave his home to file a police report in…

In re Progressive Ins. Co. v. Otero

"[C]ourts have 'consistently afforded a very liberal interpretation to the notice requirement, accepting…