From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gurney v. Gurney

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 18, 2002
804 So. 2d 601 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 5D01-1968

Opinion filed January 18, 2002

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Vincent G. Torpy, Jr., Judge.

Maureen Monaghan Matheson, of Reinman Matheson Kostro Vaughan Durham, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellant.

Joan H. Bickerstaff of Joan H. Bickerstaff, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellee.


This is an appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. Several issues were raised, but, with one exception, we affirm. Appellee acknowledges there is no record basis for inclusion of appellant's per diem pay as income. We reject appellee's argument that the error is de minimis. Accordingly, we remand to the lower court for recalculation of child support and alimony using the correct income figure.

Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and PLEUS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gurney v. Gurney

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 18, 2002
804 So. 2d 601 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Gurney v. Gurney

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY C. GURNEY, Appellant, v. SUSAN M. GURNEY, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 18, 2002

Citations

804 So. 2d 601 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Valentine v. Van Sickle

The per diem reimbursements should not be included in the Husband's monthly income for the purpose of…