From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gupta v. Walt Disney World Company

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Jul 5, 2007
Case No. 6:05-cv-1432-Orl-22UAM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 5, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 6:05-cv-1432-Orl-22UAM.

July 5, 2007


ORDER


This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Review of Cost (Doc. No. 161) filed on April 19, 2007.

The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report recommending that the Motion be granted in part and denied in part.

After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, including the objections filed by the Plaintiff (Doc. No. 170), and the Defendant's response (Doc. No. 172), the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation.

Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation filed June 11, 2007 (Doc. No. 168) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.

2. The Motion for Review of Cost (Doc. No. 161) is granted in part and denied in part.

3. Plaintiff's request that the judgment and/or order awarding costs be stayed pending appeal is DENIED.

4. The Court disallows $535.85 for the stenographic transcription of Patricia Wright's deposition and $486.08 in copying costs. The Clerk is directed to enter an Amended Bill of Costs it the amount of $6,395.84. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Orlando, Florida.


Summaries of

Gupta v. Walt Disney World Company

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Jul 5, 2007
Case No. 6:05-cv-1432-Orl-22UAM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 5, 2007)
Case details for

Gupta v. Walt Disney World Company

Case Details

Full title:ANESH GUPTA, Plaintiff, v. WALT DISNEY WORLD COMPANY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division

Date published: Jul 5, 2007

Citations

Case No. 6:05-cv-1432-Orl-22UAM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 5, 2007)

Citing Cases

Monelus v. Tocodrian, Inc.

In evaluating whether copies were necessary, the Court does not award costs for copies made merely for…

Monelus v. Tocodrian, Inc.

In evaluating whether copies were necessary, the Court does not award costs for copies made merely for…