From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gulick v. Griswold

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 17, 1899
54 N.E. 780 (N.Y. 1899)

Opinion

Argued October 9, 1899

Decided October 17, 1899

Franklin Pierce for appellant. Herbert A. Shipman for respondent.


Isaac F. Jones by his will authorized the executrix thereof, with the consent of her mother, to sell his real estate. Jones died in 1870, the mother of the executrix died in 1875, without having given her consent to a sale, and in 1896 the executrix attempted to exercise the power. The Appellate Division correctly decided that, at the time of the death of the mother, it was the law of this state that her death operated to terminate the power of sale. ( Barber v. Cary, 11 N.Y. 397.)

The contention of the appellant that section 154 of the Real Property Law (L. 1896, ch. 547) establishes that it is now the law that, notwithstanding the death of the mother, the power of sale survived and was properly executed, is not well taken in this case, as the statute was not passed until long after her death, and there is nothing in its provisions suggesting that it was intended to have a retroactive affect.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Gulick v. Griswold

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 17, 1899
54 N.E. 780 (N.Y. 1899)
Case details for

Gulick v. Griswold

Case Details

Full title:MARY E. GULICK, as Executrix of ISAAC F. JONES, Deceased, Appellant, v …

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 17, 1899

Citations

54 N.E. 780 (N.Y. 1899)
54 N.E. 780

Citing Cases

Wells v. Brooklyn Union Elevated Rd. Co. No. 1

The power of sale does not survive for the purpose of a distribution, for the corpus is not disposed of or…

Schreyer v. Schreyer

Barber v. Cary, 11 N.Y. 397, 402. Section 154 of the Real Property Law (Laws of 1896, chap. 547), modifying…