From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guinn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 22, 1995
652 So. 2d 902 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-00992.

March 22, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Maynard F. Swanson, Jr., Judge.

Jack D. Hoogewind, Ridge Manor, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


James Anthony Guinn appeals orders of restitution the trial court entered in four cases. We affirm that portion of each order setting forth the amount of restitution. However, Guinn correctly argues and the state concedes that the trial court improperly delegated to the probation officer the determination of Guinn's payment schedule. See Briggs v. State, 647 So.2d 182 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Accordingly, we reverse that portion of each order delegating to the probation officer the determination of the restitution payment schedule and remand to the trial court to establish the payment schedule and to enter the appropriate order. We otherwise affirm the judgments and sentences.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded for entry of new orders directing the payment schedule of restitution.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Guinn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 22, 1995
652 So. 2d 902 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Guinn v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ANTHONY GUINN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 22, 1995

Citations

652 So. 2d 902 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Pearce v. State

As the State concedes, the trial court erred in its original restitution order when it delegated to Mr.…

Gibson-Capo v. State

Setting a restitution payment schedule is a nondelegable judicial task. Pearce v. State, 968 So.2d 92, 93…