From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guerasio v. N.Y. State Unified Court Sys.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 12, 2013
111 A.D.3d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-11-12

In re Derek GUERASIO, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, Respondent.

O'Rourke & Degen, PLLC, New York (Ronald D. Degen of counsel), for petitioner. John W. McConnell, Office of Court Administration, New York (Pedro Morales of counsel), for respondent.



O'Rourke & Degen, PLLC, New York (Ronald D. Degen of counsel), for petitioner. John W. McConnell, Office of Court Administration, New York (Pedro Morales of counsel), for respondent.
, J.P., ACOSTA, SAXE, RENWICK, MANZANET–DANIELS, JJ.

Determination of respondent, dated March 6, 2012, which, inter alia, concurred in the Hearing Officer's findings that petitioner engaged in misconduct by failing to report for his scheduled work assignment on 197 days between December 7, 2009, and February 14, 2011, and in the Hearing Officer's recommendation that petitioner be terminated from his position as a Senior Court Officer, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Cynthia S. Kern, J.], entered September 14, 2012), dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence supports the determination that petitioner engaged in misconduct by missing 197 days of work between December 7, 2009, and February 28, 2011, and that petitioner's absences were not caused by his psychological disorders ( see Matter of Association of Surrogates & Supreme Ct. Reporters Within City of N.Y. v. State of N.Y. Unified Ct. Sys., 48 A.D.3d 228, 851 N.Y.S.2d 170 [1st Dept.2008]; Matter of Garayua v. Board of Educ. of Yonkers City Sch. Dist., 248 A.D.2d 714, 671 N.Y.S.2d 278 [2d Dept.1998] ).

The penalty of termination does not shock our sense of fairness ( see e.g. Matter of Dickinson v. New York State Unified Ct. Sys., 99 A.D.3d 569, 952 N.Y.S.2d 189 [1st Dept.2012]; Matter of Truss v. Westchester County Health Care Corp., 301 A.D.2d 607, 754 N.Y.S.2d 38 [2d Dept.2003] ).


Summaries of

Guerasio v. N.Y. State Unified Court Sys.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 12, 2013
111 A.D.3d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Guerasio v. N.Y. State Unified Court Sys.

Case Details

Full title:In re Derek GUERASIO, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 12, 2013

Citations

111 A.D.3d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
111 A.D.3d 456
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7430

Citing Cases

Quirolo v. Israel

“Judicial review of an administrative determination made after a hearing at which evidence is taken pursuant…