From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guck v. Palozzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 777 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

February 16, 2000

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Frazee, J. — Summary Judgment.

PRESENT: GREEN, A. P. J., PINE, PIGOTT, JR., AND SCUDDER, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated.

Memorandum:

Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for a knee injury she sustained when she fell on an icy patch on a sidewalk located at a shopping center owned by defendant. Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Although plaintiff will bear the burden at trial of proving that defendant had constructive notice of the icy patch on the sidewalk, on this motion for summary judgment defendant bore the burden of establishing entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see, Jordan v. Musinger, 197 A.D.2d 889). Defendant failed to establish lack of constructive notice as a matter of law. Consequently, the motion should have been denied, "regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers" ( Rodgers v. Earl, 249 A.D.2d 990; see also, Jordan v. Musinger, supra, at 889).


Summaries of

Guck v. Palozzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 777 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Guck v. Palozzi

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH A. GUCK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHESTER J. PALOZZI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 16, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 777 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
702 N.Y.S.2d 488

Citing Cases

Scansarole v. Madison Square Garden, L.P.

While, at trial, plaintiff will have to prove notice, on a defendant's motion for summary judgment the burden…

Kimpland v. Mall

Defendant argued in support of its motion that plaintiff could not set forth any evidence of negligence on…