noting that "the state need only introduce clear and convincing evidence to show that the regulation was reasonable and necessary for conservation" (citing United States v. Washington , 384 F Supp 312, 342 (WD Wash 1974) )
Summary of this case from State v. McCormackNo. 79-336.
October 29, 1979, OCTOBER TERM, 1979.
C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 597 F. 2d 1090.
noting that "the state need only introduce clear and convincing evidence to show that the regulation was reasonable and necessary for conservation" (citing United States v. Washington , 384 F Supp 312, 342 (WD Wash 1974) )
Summary of this case from State v. McCormackFull title:GUARDIAN INDUSTRIES CORP. v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 29, 1979
Kiracofe raises other issues regarding the procedures which will also be discussed. The Due Process Clause of…
United States v. SohappyThus, a State prosecuting an Indian treaty fisherman for violating a state fishing regulation must establish…