From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guadalupe v. Drackett Products Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 13, 1998
253 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

August 13, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.).


Plaintiff attempted to unclog a drain by pouring a third of a can of "Crystal Drano" into a glass jar and adding "very hot water". The combination violently erupted, causing plaintiff to suffer serious burns to her chest and other parts of her body. While defendants did not meet their burden of proof to demonstrate that the labeling on the can complied with the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (see, 15 U.S.C. § 1261 [p] [1]) so as to preclude a State law misbranding or improper labeling claim (see, Moss v. Parks Corp., 985 F.2d 736, 740-741), we agree with the motion court's determination that, as a matter of law, any purported labeling or design defects were not the proximate cause of the plaintiffs accident. Plaintiff testified that she made no attempt to read the label or to obtain assistance or instruction before using the product, and, indeed, that it was her custom not to do so. Accordingly, any purported inadequacies in the product's labeling were not a substantial factor in bringing about her injury (see, Amatulli v. Delhi Constr. Corp., 77 N.Y.2d 525, 532; Rodriguez v. Davis Equip. Corp., 235 A.D.2d 222). In addition, the affidavit of plaintiffs expert in support of her claim for product design defects was purely speculative and as such insufficient to raise a triable issue (Rodriguez v. Davis Equip. Corp., supra). We have considered plaintiffs other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Rubin and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Guadalupe v. Drackett Products Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 13, 1998
253 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Guadalupe v. Drackett Products Company

Case Details

Full title:PRIMITIVA GUADALUPE, Appellant, v. DRACKETT PRODUCTS COMPANY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Aug 13, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
676 N.Y.S.2d 177

Citing Cases

Perez v. Radar Realty

Specifically, the deposition testimony made clear that the injured plaintiff had not read defendant…

In re Faherty

To the contrary, the record reveals that the infant plaintiff was expressly warned by his father not to put…