From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guadalupe-Cruz v. I.N.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 27, 2001
250 F.3d 1271 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

No. 99-70754.

Argued and Submitted November 2, 2000.

Opinion Filed February 27, 2001. Corrected March 15, 2001.

Andrew Michael Knapp, Law Offices of Andrew Knapp, Anaheim, California, for the petitioners.

David M. McConnell, Assistant Director, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Before: BETTY B. FLETCHER, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, and RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Due to clerical error, this court's opinion, filed February 27, 2001, is corrected as follows:

1. The first sentence of the opinion (on page 2485 of the slip) [ 240 F.3d at 1210] reads:

Maria Guadalupe-Cruz and her daughters Patricia Flores-Cruz and Maria Guadalupe Flores-Cruz (collectively "Petitioners") appeal their final order of deportation entered by the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") on June 7, 1999.

The foregoing sentence should be replaced with the following sentence:

Maria Guadalupe-Cruz and her daughters Patricia Flores-Cruz and Maria Guadalupe Flores-Cruz (collectively "Petitioners") petition for review of their final order of deportation entered by the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") on June 7, 1999.

2. The fifth sentence of the opinion (on page 2486 of the slip) [ 240 F.3d at 1210] reads:

We agree, and reverse and remand to the BIA.

The foregoing sentence should be replaced with the following sentence:

We agree, and grant the petition and remand to the BIA.

3. The first sentence in the tenth paragraph of the opinion (on page 2490 of the slip) [ 240 F.3d at 1212] reads:

We reverse and remand to the BIA with instructions to remand to the IJ.

The foregoing sentence should be replaced with the following sentence:

We grant the petition and remand to the BIA with instructions to remand to the IJ.

4. The final line of the opinion (on page 2490 of the slip) [ 240 F.3d at 1212] reads:

REVERSED and REMANDED. This should be changed to read: PETITION GRANTED, REVERSED and REMANDED.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Guadalupe-Cruz v. I.N.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 27, 2001
250 F.3d 1271 (9th Cir. 2001)
Case details for

Guadalupe-Cruz v. I.N.S.

Case Details

Full title:Maria GUADALUPE-CRUZ; Patricia Flores, a.k.a. Patricia Flores-Cruz; Maria…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 27, 2001

Citations

250 F.3d 1271 (9th Cir. 2001)

Citing Cases

Otarola v. I.N.S.

The majority attempts unavailingly to distinguish the controlling case, Ram v. INS, 243 F.3d 510, 516 (9th…

Navarro v. Mukasey

Ostensibly, the hearing was delayed because the IJ wanted additional briefing — briefing that, on closer…