Opinion
Case No. 5:13-cv-01081-PSG
03-27-2013
GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED MEMORIES, INC., a Colorado Corporation, Defendant.
KORULA T. CHERIAN (SBN 133967) CONSTANCE RAMOS (SBN 203637) SARAH M. JALALI (SBN 244971) HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP Attorneys for Defendant UNITED MEMORIES, INC. JEFFREY M. SHOHET (SBN 067529) CHRISTOPHER J. BEAL (SBN 216579) VERONICA L. JACKSON (SBN 243095) DLA PIPER LLP (US) RAJIV DHARNIDHARKA (Cal. Bar No. 234756) DLA PIPER LLP (US) Attorneys for Plaintiff GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC.
KORULA T. CHERIAN (SBN 133967)
CONSTANCE RAMOS (SBN 203637)
SARAH M. JALALI (SBN 244971)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED MEMORIES, INC.
JEFFREY M. SHOHET (SBN 067529)
CHRISTOPHER J. BEAL (SBN 216579)
VERONICA L. JACKSON (SBN 243095)
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
RAJIV DHARNIDHARKA (Cal. Bar No. 234756)
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC.
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
Whereas, defendant, United Memories, Inc.("UMI") has requested additional time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in the above-captioned action; and
Whereas, plaintiff, GSI Technology ("GSI Tech") is willing to accommodate UMI's request provided that the delay in UMI's response to the Complaint will not alter or prejudice in any way GSI Tech's claim for preliminary relief as set forth in its Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order, Order to Show Cause Regarding Preliminary Injunction, and Expedited Discovery in the Alternative.
Therefore, Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff GSI Technology, Inc. and Defendant United Memories, Inc., by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that Defendant United Memories, Inc. may have an extension of time, up to and including May 1, 2013, in which to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in the above-captioned action.
The parties further stipulate that this extension of time will not prejudice the rights and remedies to which GSI Tech may be entitled and will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by the Court, including, without limitation, the hearing on Plaintiff GSI Technology, Inc.'s Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order, Order to Show Cause Regarding Preliminary Injunction, and Expedited Discovery in the Alternative, which is set for March 28, 2013.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Respectfully submitted,
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
By: ______________________
Korula T. Cherian
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED MEMORIES, INC.
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
By: ______________________
Jeffrey M. Shohet
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
______________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE