From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GS Holistic, LLC v. AA 110

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 17, 2024
2:22-cv-02034-DAD-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2024)

Opinion

2:22-cv-02034-DAD-CKD

01-17-2024

GS HOLISTIC, LLC, Plaintiff, v. AA 110, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

(DOC. NOS. 10, 16)

UNDALE A. DROZD, ITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On November 9, 2022, plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC filed this civil action against two defendants: AA 110 doing business as Dixon Smoke Shop (“Dixon Smoke Shop”), and Sayed Mehdizadeh. (Doc. No. 1.) The Clerk of the Court entered default as to both defendants because they were served with the summons and complaint and did not file a timely answer, responsive pleading, or otherwise appear in this action. (Doc. Nos. 4, 5, 8.) On June 22, 2023, plaintiff filed the pending motion for default judgment. (Doc. No. 10.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule 302.

On December 7, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiffs motion for default judgment be granted, in part. (Doc. No. 16.) Specifically, the magistrate judge recommended that statutory damages be awarded to plaintiff pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117 in the amount of $5,000, that costs be awarded in the amount of $532.00, and that judgment be entered against defendants on plaintiff's claims of trademark infringement and unfair competition under the Lanham Act, but that plaintiff's motion otherwise be denied. (Id. at 12.) The findings and recommendations provided that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (Id.) To date, no objections have been filed and the time for doing so has now passed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court concludes that the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on December 7, 2023 (Doc. No. 16) are adopted in full;
2. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against defendants (Doc. No. 10) is granted, in part, as follows;
a. Default judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendants on plaintiff's claims of trademark infringement and unfair competition under the Lanham Act;
b. Plaintiff is awarded statutory damages pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117 in the amount of $5,000.00;
c. Plaintiff is awarded costs in the amount of $532.00; and d. Plaintiff's motion is otherwise denied; and
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

GS Holistic, LLC v. AA 110

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 17, 2024
2:22-cv-02034-DAD-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2024)
Case details for

GS Holistic, LLC v. AA 110

Case Details

Full title:GS HOLISTIC, LLC, Plaintiff, v. AA 110, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 17, 2024

Citations

2:22-cv-02034-DAD-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2024)

Citing Cases

GS Holistic, LLC v. Nasher

See GS Holistic, LLC v. AA 110, No. 2:22-cv-02034-DAD-CKD, 2024 WL 200949, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. …

GS Holistic, LLC v. Cloud City Disc. Cigarettes

Mr. Folkerts's declaration only evidences a single incident of infringement, which does not warrant $150,000…