From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gruber v. Central Truck Equipment, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 2002
298 A.D.2d 360 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-09643

Submitted September 18, 2002.

October 7, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), dated August 21, 2001, which granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126.

Patrick L. Rodgers, Merrick, N.Y., for appellants.

McGivney, Kluger Gannon, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Dwight A. Kern of counsel), for respondent Central Truck Equipment, Inc.

Peter J. Creedon, Melville, N.Y. (James J. Toomey, Jr., of counsel), for respondent Theiman Tailgates, Inc.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, LEO F. McGINITY, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well established that the striking of a pleading pursuant to CPLR 3126 for failure to comply with court-ordered disclosure should be granted only where the conduct of the resisting party is shown to be willful, contumacious, or in bad faith. The plaintiffs' repeated failure to comply with orders of the Supreme Court directing disclosure, and failure to appear at multiple court conferences, support an inference of willful and contumacious conduct. Thus, the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in dismissing the complaint (see Brandes v. Pirnie-Baker, 288 A.D.2d 413; Ranfort v. Peak Tours, 250 A.D.2d 747; Frias v. Fortini, 240 A.D.2d 467; Yin Kuen Chan Tang v. Hong Kong Chinese Herbal Co., 235 A.D.2d 282).

ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, McGINITY, SCHMIDT and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gruber v. Central Truck Equipment, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 2002
298 A.D.2d 360 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Gruber v. Central Truck Equipment, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GARY GRUBER, ET AL., appellants, v. CENTRAL TRUCK EQUIPMENT, INC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 7, 2002

Citations

298 A.D.2d 360 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
751 N.Y.S.2d 392

Citing Cases

JT v. GT

"When a party's failure to comply with court-ordered disclosure is shown to be willful, contumacious, or in…

Friedman v. Naccarato

sed on a motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 is a matter generally left to the discretion of the Supreme Court (see…