From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Group v. Mar-Len Realty

Court of Appeals of Ohio
Apr 22, 1974
40 Ohio App. 2d 449 (Ohio Ct. App. 1974)

Summary

In Grandview, the Complaint described the plaintiff in the caption as "A Group of Tenants From The Grandview Homes, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated" and the address of counsel was given as the address for the plaintiff.

Summary of this case from 1821 Holdings, Inc. v. City of Toledo

Opinion

No. 1-73-98

Decided April 22, 1974.

Appeal — Parties — Unnamed persons — Not a party, when — May not appeal — App. R. 3(C) — Civ. R. 10(A).

A group of unnamed persons not constituting an incorporated association is not a legal entity capable of initiating an action and is not a party capable of initiating an appeal.

APPEAL: Court of Appeals for Allen County.

Mr. David A. Little and Mr. Alfred E. Baerkircher, for appellants.

Messrs. Everett Blair and Mr. Allan D. Dobnicker, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court dismissing a complaint which purported to state a class action, for failure to do so. The complaint described the plaintiff in the caption as:

"A Group of Tenants From The Grandview Homes, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated."

The address of their counsel was given as the address for the plaintiff. Civil Rule 10(A) states, in part: "In the complaint the title of the action shall include the names and addresses of all the parties * * *." The sole exception to this mandatory requirement appears in Civil Rule 16 which governs the case of a defendant whose name was initially unknown.

This rule is mandatory. It carries forward the preexisting requirements for the identification of the parties. 43 Ohio Jurisprudence 2d 104, Pleading, Section 69. In the newer modes of pleading, which are reliant to a great extent upon the various forms of discovery, to permit an anonymous complainant would defeat the entire theory.

It is urged that this is simply a matter of form. We disagree. The existence of an identifiable complainant is essential to the existence of an action. Particularly, as here, where an unidentified group is involved, there is no assurance that the individual components of the group may not drift in and out of the lawsuit with no one utimately responsible for it, and no one set of facts determinative of it.

If there is no complainant, there is no complaint; if there is no complainant, there can be no class action; and if there is no complainant, there can be no appellant. Appellate Rule 3(C) states, in part: "The notice of appeal shall specify the party or parties taking the appeal * * *."

A group of unnamed persons not constituting an unincorporated association is not a legal entity capable of initiating an action nor is it a party capable of initiating an appeal.

This appeal is dismissed sua sponte for want of an appellant.

Appeal dismissed.

GUERNSEY, P. J., and MILLER, J., concur.


Summaries of

Group v. Mar-Len Realty

Court of Appeals of Ohio
Apr 22, 1974
40 Ohio App. 2d 449 (Ohio Ct. App. 1974)

In Grandview, the Complaint described the plaintiff in the caption as "A Group of Tenants From The Grandview Homes, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated" and the address of counsel was given as the address for the plaintiff.

Summary of this case from 1821 Holdings, Inc. v. City of Toledo

In Grandview, the court held that under Ohio law, "the complaint [must] contain the names and address of all parties except for a defendant whose name is initially unknown."

Summary of this case from 1821 Holdings, Inc. v. City of Toledo
Case details for

Group v. Mar-Len Realty

Case Details

Full title:GROUP OF TENANTS FROM GRANDVIEW HOMES, APPELLANTS, v. MAR-LEN REALTY…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio

Date published: Apr 22, 1974

Citations

40 Ohio App. 2d 449 (Ohio Ct. App. 1974)
321 N.E.2d 241

Citing Cases

Villavicencio v. City of Columbus

Heine v. Crall, 10th Dist. No. 93AP-65, 1993 Ohio App. LEXIS 2616 (May 18, 1993). "This requirement is…

Noe Bixby Road Neighbors v. Columbus City Council

Particularly, as here, where an unidentified group is involved, there is no assurance that the individual…