From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grote v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Mar 13, 1930
149 A. 551 (Md. 1930)

Opinion

[Nos. 29, 30, 31, January Term, 1930.]

Decided March 13th, 1930.

Decided March 13th, 1930.

Appeals from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (O'DUNNE, J.).

The causes were argued, together with that next preceding, before BOND, C.J., URNER, ADKINS, OFFUTT, DIGGES, and PARKE, JJ.

Palmer R. Nickerson and George Ross Veazey, with whom was Edwin W. Wells on the brief, for the appellants.

Fendall Marbury, for the appellee.


For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the case of Sophie Grote v. Mrs. Charles Stanley Rogers, being No. 28 on the docket of the present term, the similar orders in the cases of Henry Grote, Helen Riddle and J. Frank Riddle, against the same appellee, being Nos. 29, 30 and 31, on the docket of the present term, and involving the same question. are hereby affirmed with costs.


Summaries of

Grote v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Mar 13, 1930
149 A. 551 (Md. 1930)
Case details for

Grote v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:HENRY GROTE v . MRS. CHARLES STANLEY ROGERS. HELEN RIDDLE v . SAME. J…

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Mar 13, 1930

Citations

149 A. 551 (Md. 1930)
149 A. 551

Citing Cases

Assurance Corporation v. Perkins

The fact that the defendant had, in any other than the specified manner, acquired actual knowledge of the…