holding that a trial judge was not required to recuse himself where his son was an associate at the law firm representing the defendant because his son did not work on the matter and his salary interest was too remote to constitute a disqualifying “financial interest”

Summary of this case from Ravikant v. Rohde

See 8 Summaries

Opinion

Nos. 77-717, 77-727.

January 16, 1978.

C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 563 F. 2d 1057.

Summaries of

Gross v. Newburger, Loeb Co.

U.S.

Jan 16, 1978

434 U.S. 1035 (1978)

Summary of this case from Ravikant v. Rohde

holding that judge was not required to recuse himself when son was an associate in the firm

Summary of this case from In re Trafford Distributing Center, Inc.

holding that judge was not required to recuse himself when son was an associate in the firm

Summary of this case from Kapila v. Clark (In re Trafford Distributing Ctr. Inc.)

holding that judge was not required to recuse himself when son was an associate in the firm

Summary of this case from In re Trafford Distributing Center, Inc.

holding that the execution of a transfer agreement which consummated the sale of the partnership assets, without the written consent of the limited partners, violated § 98(b)

Summary of this case from Williams v. Cottonwood Cove Dev. Co.

finding that defendant credit bureau's failure to reveal its "detective agency" like practices did not violate FCA because the government never "made it clear that it would not employ detective agencies when it contracted for the work"

Summary of this case from Luckey v. Baxter Healthcare

dismissing pendent counterclaims dependent on proof of facts entirely irrelevant to antitrust counterclaim

Summary of this case from U.S. Football League v. Nat. Football

limiting doctrine to intervenors

Summary of this case from Burns v. Ersek

Case details for