From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gross v. Gross

Supreme Court, Kings Special Term for Motions
Feb 1, 1920
110 Misc. 278 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1920)

Opinion

February, 1920.

James E. Smyth, for plaintiff.

Louis A. Rosenstein, for defendant.


In a judgment of divorce obtained by the plaintiff the defendant was required to provide for the children of the marriage. Later the plaintiff remarried, and these children were legally adopted by her new husband. Now the defendant moves to strike from the judgment the direction requiring him to support the children. His contention is that their adoption by their stepfather relieved him from all parental duties and responsibility. That is the provision of the statue. Dom. Rel. Law, § 114. The children could be legally adopted after the divorce without the consent of the defendant. Id. § 111. The whole statute shows that after an adoption the natural parent is no longer deemed to be the parent of the person adopted for any purpose, except that the adopted person may inherit from him. Id. § 114; Matter of MacRae, 189 N.Y. 142, 147, 148; Carpenter v. Buffalo General Electric Co., 213 id. 101.

As the defendant has been relieved by the adoption from all his parental duties and responsibilities, he cannot longer be required to support the children.

Motion granted.


Summaries of

Gross v. Gross

Supreme Court, Kings Special Term for Motions
Feb 1, 1920
110 Misc. 278 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1920)
Case details for

Gross v. Gross

Case Details

Full title:STELLA GROSS, Plaintiff, v . MAX GROSS, Defendant

Court:Supreme Court, Kings Special Term for Motions

Date published: Feb 1, 1920

Citations

110 Misc. 278 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1920)
179 N.Y.S. 900

Citing Cases

St. Germain v. St. Germain

It is thus apparent that, in the cited case, we specifically saved the question here presented. In concluding…

Matter of Pierro

Rel. Law, § 115; Carpenter v. Buffalo General Electric Company, 213 N.Y. 101, 108; Matter of Cook, 187 id.…