From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gross v. Fontano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 25, 1994
206 A.D.2d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

July 25, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff, by failing to object to the verdict as inconsistent before the jury was discharged, did not preserve that argument for appellate review (see, e.g., Barone v. City of Mount Vernon, 170 A.D.2d 557). In any event, the verdict was not inconsistent (see, Barry v. Manglass, 55 N.Y.2d 803). Bracken, J.P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gross v. Fontano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 25, 1994
206 A.D.2d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Gross v. Fontano

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD A. GROSS, Appellant, v. RICHARD FONTANO et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 25, 1994

Citations

206 A.D.2d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
615 N.Y.S.2d 279

Citing Cases

Reese v. New York City Board of Education

The plaintiffs contend that the verdict was internally inconsistent and therefore against the weight of the…

Kordasiewicz v. Buchholz

Memorandum: Plaintiffs failed to object to the verdict as inconsistent before the jury was discharged, when…