From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gross v. AT&T Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 28, 2021
19 CIVIL 2892 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 28, 2021)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 2892 (VEC)

09-28-2021

MELVIN GROSS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. AT&T INC., RANDALL L. STEPHENSON, JOHN J. STEPHENS, SAMUEL A. DI PIAZZA, JR., RICHARD W. FISHER, SCOTT T. FORD, GLENN H. HUTCHINS, WILLIAM E. KENNARD, MICHAEL B. MCCALLISTER, BETH E. MOONEY, JOYCE M. ROCHÉ, MATTHEW K. ROSE, CYNTHIA B. TAYLOR, LAURA D'ANDREA TYSON, and GEOFFREY Y. YANG, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated September 27, 2021, Plaintiffs' motion to amend the complaint is DENIED. Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed with prejudice; accordingly, the case is closed.


Summaries of

Gross v. AT&T Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 28, 2021
19 CIVIL 2892 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Gross v. AT&T Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN GROSS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 28, 2021

Citations

19 CIVIL 2892 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 28, 2021)

Citing Cases

San Antonio Fire & Police Pension Fund v. Dentsply Sirona Inc.

Defendants rightly argue that even aggressive sales targets do not necessarily suggest wrongdoing. See, e.g.,…

Hawes v. Argo Blockchain PLC

” Gross v. AT&T Inc., 19-cv-2892, 2021 WL 9803956, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 27, 2021), aff'd sub…