From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gropp v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1912
98 N.E. 1103 (N.Y. 1912)

Opinion

Argued May 14, 1912

Decided June 4, 1912

William Hazen Peck and John W. Crandall for appellant.

Don R. Almy for respondent.


Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on the ground that the amendment of the complaint allowed by the trial court introduced a new and different cause of action, as to which this court concurs in the dissenting opinion of INGRAHAM, P.J., below; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., HAIGHT, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ.


Summaries of

Gropp v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1912
98 N.E. 1103 (N.Y. 1912)
Case details for

Gropp v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Case Details

Full title:HENRY E. GROPP, Respondent, v . THE GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 4, 1912

Citations

98 N.E. 1103 (N.Y. 1912)
205 N.Y. 617