Opinion
30037.
SUBMITTED JUNE 17, 1975.
DECIDED JULY 1, 1975.
Contempt. Tattnall Superior Court. Before Judge Harvey.
Richard D. Phillips, for appellant.
Cowart Cowart, Dan S. Cowart, for appellee.
Appellee mother brought an application for contempt against the appellant father. He appeals from a judgment holding him in contempt for failing to comply with the visitation rights of the appellee.
In its final order holding the appellant in contempt the trial court changed custody of the three minor children from the father to the mother. The appellant contends that this part of the judgment affecting custody of the children is error.
We agree. We have held many times that the trial court has no authority in a contempt proceeding to modify the terms of a divorce decree. Beach v. Beach, 224 Ga. 701 ( 164 S.E.2d 114); Herrington v. Herrington, 231 Ga. 177 ( 200 S.E.2d 867); Carr v. Frier, 232 Ga. 760 ( 208 S.E.2d 849).
There is not transcript of the contempt proceeding and the judgment of the trial court holding the appellant in contempt is affirmed, with direction that so much of the judgment changing custody of the minor children from the appellant to the appellee be deleted from the contempt judgment.
Judgment affirmed with direction. All the Justices concur.