From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gritter v. Adult & Family Services Division

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 11, 2002
53 P.3d 469 (Or. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

2-0101-DE2393; A114316

Filed: September 11, 2002

Judicial Review from Adult and Family Services Division.

On respondent's Motion to Dismiss Judicial Review as Moot and to Vacate Decision filed June 21, 2002.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Jas. Jeffrey Adams, Assistant Attorney General, for motion.

No appearance contra.

Before BREWER, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM and KISTLER, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Previous decision vacated; dismissed as moot.


Respondent Adult Family and Services Division (AFSD) has moved to dismiss the petition for judicial review and to vacate our earlier decision in the case. See Gritter v. AFSD , 182 Or. App. 249, 48 P.3d 195 (2002). AFSD argues that, because the case became moot before we issued our opinion, the case should be dismissed and our opinion vacated. We agree.

Petitioner sought review of an order in a contested case. After she filed her petition for review, AFSD moved to withdraw its order pursuant to ORS 183.482(6) to present additional evidence. Petitioner objected, arguing that AFSD could withdraw its order and present new evidence only under ORS 183.482(5). Despite petitioner's pending objection, AFSD held a hearing, took new evidence, and issued an order on reconsideration. The case went to the appellate settlement conference program, see ORAP 15.05, which resulted in a settlement. The court is not aware of which cases are selected for the settlement program, and the parties neglected to advise us that the case had settled. See ORAP 8.45. Seven weeks later, we issued our opinion, holding that, if AFSD wanted to present additional evidence, it needed to meet the standards set out in ORS 183.482(5). Gritter, 182 Or. App. at 255-56. Respondent contends, and we agree, that the parties' prior settlement rendered this case moot. We also agree that, because the case was moot when we issued our decision, our previous decision should be vacated. See Kay v. David Douglas Sch. Dist. No. 40, 303 Or. 574, 738 P.2d 1389 (1987), cert den 484 U.S. 1032 (1988).

Previous decision vacated; dismissed as moot.


Summaries of

Gritter v. Adult & Family Services Division

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 11, 2002
53 P.3d 469 (Or. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Gritter v. Adult & Family Services Division

Case Details

Full title:ANGELA GRITTER (MOTHERSHED), Petitioner, v. ADULT FAMILY SERVICES…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 11, 2002

Citations

53 P.3d 469 (Or. Ct. App. 2002)
53 P.3d 469

Citing Cases

Bidwell v. Baker

In evaluating plaintiff's decision in 1999 to pursue his appeal without notifying this court of the alleged…