From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grimaldi v. Suffolk Cty. Dept. of Hlt. Serv

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 10, 1986
118 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

March 10, 1986


Petition granted to the extent that the determination is annulled, on the law, with costs payable by the department to the petitioners, and matter remitted to the department for a new hearing and determination in accordance herewith. In all other respects, petition denied and proceeding dismissed on the merits.

The record lacks substantial evidence to support the department's determination to grant the respondent De Betta a variance. The record does not show that in reaching its determination the department considered any health or safety factors, including the effect of the De Betta septic system on the petitioners' wells. Accordingly, the matter is remitted for a new hearing at which time the department shall investigate and make specific findings with respect to the issue of the health and safety factors involved in granting a variance, including the various alternatives involved. Bracken, J.P., Niehoff, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Grimaldi v. Suffolk Cty. Dept. of Hlt. Serv

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 10, 1986
118 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Grimaldi v. Suffolk Cty. Dept. of Hlt. Serv

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN D. GRIMALDI et al., Petitioners, v. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 10, 1986

Citations

118 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Nilsson v. Envtl. Protection

III. Appellant applied an improper standard of "substantial hardship" in its review of respondents' variance…